Author Archive
I hate nature
Posted by: | CommentsOK, I don’t actually hate nature, but my niece made me watch this video yesterday and I had to share. It’s not exactly new — it’s been around since late 2008 — but it made me laugh.
Warning: defiitely NSFW!
“This animal is bullshit!” Excellent.
Small Screen Stakeout: Jan 29, 2010 (Episode 3)
Posted by: | Comments
Click the red play button to listen to the podcast now, or subscribe to it by clicking the “download” button.
To subscribe to our new XML feed for this podcast, paste http://sarahwarn.com/podcasts/small-screen-podcast.xml in your RSS reader. If you previously subscribed to this feed, you’ll have to update your RSS reader with this new XML feed.
Veronica and Linda team up to fight the power on Better Off Ted, Bones calls Booth out on his relationship with his brother on Bones, and the American Idol auditions include an awkward scene in which Ryan Seacrest gets pissed off at a guy hitting on him.
Lori and I discuss all this and more — including our thoughts on the iPad — in this week’s episode of Small Screen Stakeout.
We also review The Dirty Bomb Diaries, a low-key but effective 16-episode series chronicling the experiences of a young woman (played by Misty Van Cleve) in the aftermath of disaster: If you were trapped in a city after a radioactive Dirty Bomb detonated, what would you be willing to do? Who would you become? Witness the conflict through the eyes of a single woman struggling at Ground Zero with no supplies, sporadic phone service, a lack of police support and a city ready to tear itself apart. We discuss the making of the series and tell the story of how we survived the great Seattle earthquake of 2001.
You can watch the first two episodes below, and the rest on Clicker.com.
Small Screen Stakeout: January 22, 2010 (Episode 2)
Posted by: | Comments
Click the red play button to listen to the podcast now, or subscribe to it by clicking the “download” button.
To subscribe to the rss feed for this podcast, paste http://sarahwarn.com/podcasts/small-screen-podcast.rss in your RSS reader (we don’t yet have it in iTunes).
This week on Small Screen Stakeout, Lori and I cover the JFK conspiracy on Bones, Better Off Ted’s bagel-throwing contest, the latest American Idol auditions, Sarah Paulson’s terrific performance on last week’s Law and Order: SVU, the Samantha Bee/sexual harassment episode of the last Law and Order, Callie and Arizona’s “hot” makeout session on Grey’s Anatomy, the flashbacks on The Office, and the premiere of the new ABC legal drama The Deep End — which needs a lot more depth. Plus, Defying Gravity, Caprica, and Sofia Vergara on Ellen.
The web series we’re discussing this week is last summer’s high-profile web series Foreign Body, a 50-episode prequel leading up to the release of Robin Cook’s new medical thriller of the same name.
Here’s a compilation of the first four episodes (they’re only two minutes long each). If you’re a glutton for punishment, you can watch the rest of the episodes on the series’ official site.
To say Foreign Body is a parade of sexist and cultural stereotypes is an understatement — not to mention the plot is confusing and the acting sub-par. It’s all especially appalling when you consider that it was backed by Michael Eisner, sponsored by Honda, and cost $10,000 an episode to make. But more about that in the podcast!
Add your thoughts on this and the rest of this week’s topics in the comments.
Small Screen Stakeout: January 15, 2010 (Episode 1)
Posted by: | Comments
Click the red play button to listen to the podcast now, or subscribe to it by clicking the “download” button.
To subscribe to the rss feed for this podcast, paste http://sarahwarn.com/podcasts/small-screen-podcast.rss in your RSS reader (we don’t yet have it in iTunes).
Lori and I spend so much time discussing the TV shows we watch, we decided to launch a weekly podcast so you all can share in the fun/arguments. This week we cover Bones, Better Off Ted, American Idol, Fringe, Law and Order: SVU, Grey’s Anatomy, Modern Family, and my personal favorite, The Good Wife, as well as two two new web series/videos which I’ve embedded below so you can watch them before listening, if you want to.
This being our first audio podcast, it’s a little on the long side, and includes a lot of rambling asides — from six degrees of Sanaa Lathan, to the benefits of marathoning TV shows, to why we hated the latest Twilight movie New Moon. It clocks in at around an hour and half, so you may want to multi-task while you listen.
Hope you enjoy it, and let me know in the comments if you agree/disagree with our take on a show or episode.
Sites I like: Women In Crime Ink
Posted by: | CommentsI don’t remember how I stumbled across Women in Crime Ink (I think I was googling some statistic I heard on an episode of Law and Order: SVU), but it’s now become one of the sites I browse at least once a week.
A blog about women, crime, and the media whose contributors range from policewomen to sex-crimes prosecutors to forensics experts to mystery novelists, the content on Women in Crime Ink is an interesting mix of information about the law, forensics, and criminology; the psychology of criminals and victims; critiques of how the media covers a particular crime (or type of crime); advice for mystery writers; and true crime stories.

Here are some of their recent blog posts:
- Cutting-edge FBI Data Technology - an overview of how the FBI uses computers and technology to track criminals
- What Makes a True Crime Book Bad?
- Christmas Tidings of Mayhem - a look back at the 1885 Austin, TX serial killer dubbed the “Servant Girl Annihilator”, who was never apprehended
- 2009: Sex, Sex, and More Sex - a review of the year’s high-profile cases of infidelity and sexual assault
- Lessons From the Dead - why adolescents are especially vulnerable to predators and how they can protect themselves
I’m not a huge fan of true crime stories, but I’m interested in the statistics and psychology of criminal behavior. It may seem like a morbid topic, but we live in a culture rife with crime, and reading the perspectives of women who are experts in this field gives me important information, and food for thought.
If you’re interested in criminology, writing a mystery or true crime novel, or just learning more about the world we live in, check it out at womenincrimink.com.
Writing for the Internet: Comment your way in
Posted by: | Comments
There are lots of tips available for freelancers trying to break into writing for online publications, but one topic I don’t see mentioned very often is the value of the well-crafted comment.
Editors get solicited all the time by potential writers via email pitches, and sometimes this works (I’ll write more on that in a future blog post), but commenting is another and sometimes better way to land a writing gig.
The right comment can:
- illustrate your writing ability
- show you can take initiative
- communicate you understand the tone and style of the writing on the site
- demonstrate your passion for and knowledge of the subject matter
Consistently posting high-quality comments on a site you want to write for may not lead to freelance work right away, but it’s likely to put you on their radar — or someone else’s — and land you writing assignments in the future.
Case in point: I discovered one of my best AfterEllen.com writers because of a single comment she left on the site.
Her comment stood out among the hundreds of others because it was well-written, intelligent, funny, and deflected criticism through sarcasm without being mean-spirited or resorting to personal attacks. Not only did the comment amuse me (never underestimate the power of provoking an emotional response in an editor), it demonstrated that the author had a good understanding of the zeitgeist of the site (which is often the most difficult thing to communicate to potential writers).
I was impressed enough by her comment that I contacted her via private message and invited her to write a sample blog post for us. A year later, she’s become one of the site’s most popular writers, and other sites have subsequently hired her for freelance writing work. She’s well on her way to being able to make a living writing full-time.
Don’t get me wrong: Her success is due to her talent and hard work. But she got her first break because she took the time to leave a thoughtful, well-written, and entertaining comment.
This story isn’t uncommon: I know of several other writers who have been hired by blogs or editorial sites by making a good impression in the comments or in forum threads. From an editor’s perspective, it’s always good to receive a killer sample piece from a writer trying to impress you, but it’s even better when someone impresses you without trying.
What qualifies as a “well-crafted” comment?
It varies slightly based on the tone and focus of the site and article/post/video you’re commenting on, but some themes are universal: clarity, wit, creativity, and most importantly, grammatically correct sentences with proper capitalization and spelling. This last point should go without saying, but unfortunately, an increasing number of comments look something like this:
i love this movie its so cool if u dont like it ur just a hater
At least this makes it easier for professional writers to stand out, simply by crossing their t’s and capitalizing their I’s — which is the only good thing about the rapid decline of proper punctuation and capitalization on the internet. But that’s a rant for another day.
The bottom line: if you want to write for a living, or even as a hobby, take care with what you write even in informal settings. You never know who’s paying attention.
The party goes on without me
Posted by: | CommentsIt’s been almost a month now since I left AfterEllen.com, and I’m still getting used to the idea that I don’t have to scour the Hollywood trade sites every night for news, or watch every minor lesbian subplot on TV (although I have to admit, I didn’t mind watching Ella and the model on last week’s Melrose Place).
One of the things that pushed me into leaving was the realization that not only was I burned out, but this was actually hindering the site from being as good as it could be. As most writers will tell you, it takes a certain amount of emotional energy to write analytically, regardless of whether you’re writing a short blog post or a 3-page article (especially if you’re trying to make it entertaining at the same time). Trying to navigate the phalanx of Hollywood publicists, managers, and network executives to get information or an interview takes a toll, too.
Really, the excitement starts to wane after doing almost anything for over 7 years, especially 14 hours a day.
But being burned out meant I was doing less writing and chasing down interviews, which translated to less interesting content on the site — and that wasn’t OK with me. I wanted the site to succeed, even if that meant I had to leave. (Also, I wanted some sleep, to read books again, and to experience this thing called a weekend that I’ve heard everyone rave about.)
The last month has only affirmed my decision. It’s been great to see all the good things happening on AfterEllen.com since I left — from the interviews Karman and the writers have lined up (many of which haven’t been published yet), to Trish’s Morning Brew column (which I love and wish I’d thought of myself), to the interesting entertainment coverage they have in the works that won’t be published for awhile.
I talk to Karman and Trish a few times a week, but mostly just to answer random technical questions, catch up on the latest lesbian entertainment gossip, or just to say hi.
Turns out, they don’t need me all that much — and I couldn’t be happier (or more well-rested). Now that I get to be a guest at the party, instead of hosting it, it’s fun again! I still tend to automatically scour for typos (a habit that will probably take me years to undue), but now when I read AfterEllen.com’s blog posts and articles, I just get to enjoy them with everyone else.
Not that I have a ton of time to do that, unfortunately — I’m hard at work again, on an entertainment-related site still in development that Lori and I were recruited to run.
Yes, it was a short break. But my new job doesn’t require writing or interviewing anyone.
And for the first time in years, watching bad lesbian movies is entirely optional.
Sites I like: Clicker.com
Posted by: | CommentsA tweet from Scribegrrrl tipped me off to Clicker.com, an interesting just-out-of-beta site that bills itself as “the complete guide to Internet Television.”
Started by “a passionate team of TV-loving freaks with search engine, media, data and content management backgrounds,” Clicker.com is “one part directory, one part search engine, one part wiki, one part entertainment guide, and one part DVR [and] contains more than 450,000 episodes, from over 6,000 shows, from over 1,200 networks, tens of thousands of movies, and 50,000 music videos from 20,000 artists.”
You can easily browse videos by type of content (TV, movies, web originals and music) as well as genre (drama, comedy, action, etc.). Some of the videos are embedded, but many listings link off to other sites (e.g. the Buffy the Vampire Slayer listing sends you to TheWB.com).
There are internet video sites like NewTeeVee.com and TubeFilter.com that review and/or feature original web series; sites like Hulu that only feature online video related to network TV content; and sites like YouTube that include all of the above as well as soft porn, fan videos, and video blogs.
But this is the first I’ve come across that focuses on aggregating all “television or television-quality” web video, regardless of who produced it, and it most likely won’t be the last.
A site like Clicker.com would seem to be at a significant competitive disadvantage to popular and well-funded sites like Hulu and YouTube. But the diversity and huge volume of videos on YouTube is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness (it’s easy to get overwhelmed when searching for something, and the increasing number of spam videos are annoying), and as popular as Hulu is, they’re held hostage by Hollywood’s profitable but confusing to consumers windowing strategy which makes content available on Hulu only at certain times (Hulu includes some independent web series, but buries them beneath the studio content).
Hulu expects these windows to “converge over time,” but until then, there’s a gap to be filled by sites like Clicker.com.
And I’m on board with any site that helps me find ways to watch the web series Anyone But Me, a Feist music video, episodes of Lincoln Heights, and The Secret of NIMH.
Andrea’s high school reunion
Posted by: | CommentsA friend just tipped me off to this funny video called “I Remember Andrea,” about a woman named Andrea Wachner who hired a stripper to attend her high-school reunion in her place, basically to have some fun at her classmates’ expense.
The Real Andrea (Andrea Wachner)
Real Andrea rigged up a video camera at the event ahead of time, fed Fake Andrea info about each classmate through an ear piece, and then sat back and watched the resulting fun from a nearby hotel room, via a live feed on her laptop.
Fake Andrea
The resulting funny/awkward scenes include Fake Andrea asking one classmate “Am I only the only stripper in the class?” and asking a male (Republican) classmate, “are you straight or gay?” Sadly, Fake Andrea did not claim to have invented the Post It or quick-burning cigarettes, which would have made it even funnier, but I suppose that would have been tipping her hand too much.
“Andrea” chats up a former classmate
Naturally, Fake Andrea ends up stripping at the end of the evening, which finally tips off some of her classmates to the fact that everything might not be quite as it seems.
Watch it here:
The video kind of meanders at the end, but I love the effort and creativity that went into this. As one commenter said about it on YouTube said “you might have won the internet.”
“I Remember Andrea” is currently making the film festival rounds — you can read more about it on IRememberAndrea.com and its Facebook fan page.




